Puncheon's FA charge

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Puncheon's FA charge

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 2 of 2 << First < 1 2

Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 24 Feb 14 7.47pm
Quote Selhurstboys at 24 Feb 2014 7.19pm Repeating a libel is viewed in the same way as the libel itself. Surely only if someone repeats it with the intention of showing they believe the same...If you're simply reporting what someone else has said I can't see that as being libelous, it's a statement of fact, the truth. That would be for a court to decide. Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham
Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt

Clapham on the Back 24 Feb 14 7.47pm

Quote Selhurstboys at 24 Feb 2014 7.19pm

Repeating a libel is viewed in the same way as the libel itself.

Surely only if someone repeats it with the intention of showing they believe the same...If you're simply reporting what someone else has said I can't see that as being libelous, it's a statement of fact, the truth.

That would be for a court to decide.

Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert a moderator to this post

Selhurstboys Basel 24 Feb 14 7.50pm
Puncheon. might have a case to answer but he's got one too. Warnock brought his name into disrepute by saying he wouldn't trust him in a million years to take a penalty. He reacted to that as anyone would but got his response wrong. However, he was quite clearly provoked by Warnock who started it. Warnock's also had at least one FA charge before anyway so he's no stranger to controversy. It has been reported that Warnock also stated he'd had direct contact with Puncheon to clear up the issue so I think the FA should simply do that...FA.
Alert a moderator to this post

Selhurstboys

Basel 24 Feb 14 7.50pm

Puncheon. might have a case to answer but he's got one too. Warnock brought his name into disrepute by saying he wouldn't trust him in a million years to take a penalty. He reacted to that as anyone would but got his response wrong. However, he was quite clearly provoked by Warnock who started it. Warnock's also had at least one FA charge before anyway so he's no stranger to controversy.
It has been reported that Warnock also stated he'd had direct contact with Puncheon to clear up the issue so I think the FA should simply do that...FA.

Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle 25 Feb 14 5.55am
Quote Selhurstboys at 24 Feb 2014 7.50pm Puncheon. might have a case to answer but he's got one too. Warnock brought his name into disrepute by saying he wouldn't trust him in a million years to take a penalty. He reacted to that as anyone would but got his response wrong. However, he was quite clearly provoked by Warnock who started it. Are you saying that not being trusted to take a penalty is as bad as corruption?
Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle

25 Feb 14 5.55am

Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle

Quote Selhurstboys at 24 Feb 2014 7.50pm

Are you saying that not being trusted to take a penalty is as bad as corruption?

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 2 of 2 << First < 1 2

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Puncheon's FA charge

Site Map